Read the Lines · Market Structure

How to Mark Market Structure
on a Real Chart.

Start with the clearest significant swing highs and lows, read them left to right, then classify the sequence before adding smaller internal structure. The goal is not to label every movement. It is to build a repeatable description of the chart.

Quick answer

How do you mark market structure?

Choose one timeframe, identify the most obvious turning points, label each significant high or low relative to the previous comparable swing, then ask whether the sequence is broadly upward, downward or ranging. Only after that should you zoom in to smaller swings.

Step 1

Choose the timeframe before you start.

Do not begin on a daily chart, spot a confusing move and then jump to the five-minute chart until you find a pattern you like. Decide what level of structure you are trying to understand first.

For broader ASX chart education, daily structure is often a useful starting point because it filters much of the intraday noise while preserving meaningful swings.

Step 2

Mark only the obvious turning points first.

Look for the places where price clearly changed direction and travelled far enough away for the move to matter. Ignore one-candle hesitations and tiny internal swings on the first pass.

If removing a small turning point would not change your description of the trend, it probably does not need to be part of the main structural map.

Step 3

Compare each swing with the one before it.

Is the new significant high above or below the previous significant high? Is the new low above or below the previous significant low?

Those comparisons create your HH, HL, LH and LL labels. Read them in sequence rather than treating each label as an independent signal.

Step 4

Classify the broad state.

Mostly HH + HL

Describe the structure as upward on that timeframe.

Mostly LH + LL

Describe the structure as downward on that timeframe.

Mixed and overlapping

Consider range, transition or unclear structure instead of forcing a directional label.

Step 5

Mark the structural levels that would change the description.

In an uptrend, ask which significant higher low currently matters to the continuation of that sequence. In a downtrend, ask which significant lower high or prior low matters to the existing description.

These levels become useful reference points because crossing them would change something about the structural story.

Step 6

Only then add internal structure if it helps.

Once the larger map is clear, smaller swings can answer more detailed questions: is a pullback weakening? Has short-term momentum shifted? Is price building a smaller range inside the larger trend?

Because the hierarchy is already established, those smaller labels now have context instead of competing with the larger structure.

The test

Could another person reproduce your chart?

If your swing rules are so flexible that two versions of you could mark completely different structure depending on what happened next, the process is too subjective.

You do not need perfect objectivity, but you do need enough consistency that the method can be reviewed, tested and improved.

Marking structure FAQ

Quick answers

Should I mark every swing?

No. Start with the significant turning points relevant to your timeframe and question.

Should I use lines or zones?

Either can work. Exact swing prices are useful references, while zones can better reflect areas where several nearby turns occurred.

Should wicks define swing highs and lows?

Wicks record the traded extremes and are commonly used, but a close-based method is also possible if it is defined consistently.

What if the chart looks messy?

Mark fewer swings. If the larger sequence remains unclear, describe the chart as mixed or ranging rather than inventing precision.

Keep learning

Finish with the mistakes that make structure look easier than it is.

7 Market Structure Mistakes Beginners Make

← Back to Market Structure

Important information: This page provides general educational content about market structure and technical analysis. It does not provide financial product advice or recommendations. Examples explain concepts and are not forecasts or recommendations about any ASX security.